After reading the two articles linked to the EDA March Agenda for March 14/15, please post your response below using our usual guidelines.
To earn all participation points:
- Start your entry with your first name, last initial, EDA period # and EDA teacher name.
- Write in complete, well-constructed sentences.
- Use proper capitalization, punctuation, language and spelling throughout.
- Build paragraphs with a clear beginning, supporting evidence or detail statements, and conclusions.
- Your entry should be 250 words in length.
You should type and save your response in a Google or Word document, then copy and paste into the comment section below - these programs can show word count.
- State the judgment clearly and specifically in your own words.
- Describe in detail the judge's reasoning for the judgment - find and state as many reasons/arguments as possible between the two articles.
- Identify what groups were in favor of this judgment. There is some surprise to their response - explain as best you can why the response might have been surprising.
- Identify those who are in opposition to this judgment. What are their future plans?
- What are some immediate consequences of the judgment?